yorgos mitralias
Abonné·e de Mediapart

75 Billets

0 Édition

Billet de blog 23 mai 2022

Why does Putin make all the Soviet dead of the Second World War... "Russians"?

Having decreed that there is no Ukrainian nation, Putin obviously cannot admit that there were millions of Ukrainians who died fighting the Third Reich

yorgos mitralias
Abonné·e de Mediapart

Ce blog est personnel, la rédaction n’est pas à l’origine de ses contenus.

Lies, fraud and sacrilege*

Why does Putin make all the Soviet dead of the Second World War... "Russians"?

By Yorgos Mitralias

May 9 has come and gone, and as has been the constant for the past two decades, both Mr. Putin's enemies and friends have repeated in unison that on May 9 of every year, Russia remembers and honors the 20 or 25 plus million of its dead during World War II. It even seems that in recent years, and even more so this year because of Mr. Putin's war on Ukraine, these millions of Russian dead have been commemorated even more forcefully in order to highlight - apparently - the absence of Ukrainians from the martyrology.

All this is just another huge lie. Or rather a huge macabre fraud which only serves the Great Russian propaganda of the present regime. And this is why. First of all, all these dead commemorated were not Russians but... first and foremost Soviet civilians and military. The difference is not insignificant and the first person who should agree with it is Mr. Putin himself, who knows something about the abyss that separates the cursed Soviet Union from his Russian Federation, since he usually loses his temper in public when he talks about the October Revolution, Lenin and his Bolsheviks.

But let's see if there is a grain of truth in Mr. Putin's propaganda. Were the Soviet citizens and servicemen who died during and because of the Second World War only Russians? The answer is given by the following table borrowed from the relevant Wikipedia article (in French and English), which is based on Vadim Erlikman's study: Poteri narodonaseleniia v XX veke: spravochnik, Moscow 2004 (ISBN 5-93165-107-1) pp. 23-35.

Deaths by Soviet republic

Soviet Republic Population 1940 Military Dead Civilian Dead Total Deaths as
 % 1940 Pop. Armenian SSR 1,320,000 150,000 30,000 180,000 13.6% Azerbaijan SSR 3,270,000 210,000 90,000 300,000 9.1% Byelorussian SSR 9,050,000 620,000 1,670,000 2,290,000 25.3% Estonian SSR 1,050,000 30,000 50,000 80,000 7.6% Georgian SSR 3,610,000 190,000 110,000 300,000 8.3% Kazakh SSR 6,150,000 310,000 350,000 660,000 10.7% Kirghiz SSR 1,530,000 70,000 50,000 120,000 7.8% Latvian SSR 1,890,000 30,000 230,000 260,000 13.7% Lithuanian SSR 2,930,000 25,000 350,000 375,000 12.7% Moldavian SSR 2,470,000 50,000 120,000 170,000 6.9% Russian SFSR 110,100,000 6,750,000 7,200,000 13,950,000 12.7% (A) Tajik SSR 1,530,000 50,000 70,000 120,000 7.8% Turkmen SSR 1,300,000 70,000 30,000 100,000 7.7% Uzbek SSR 6,550,000 330,000 220,000 550,000 8.4% Ukrainian SSR 41,340,000 1,650,000 5,200,000 6,850,000 16.3% (B) Unidentified - 165,000 130,000 295,000 Total USSR 194,090,000 10,700,000 15,900,000 26,600,000 13.7%

The answer, obviously, is no. Of course, the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic, which at the time had by far the largest population (110 million), had more deaths in absolute numbers than any other Soviet Socialist Republic. However, things change considerably when the calculation is made on the basis of the percentage of the population of each Soviet Republic represented by its civilian and military dead. Indeed, the percentage of dead Russians (12.7%) is lower than the average percentage of the entire Soviet Union (13.7%)! Moreover, the percentage of Ukraine is considerably higher (16.3%), which places it in second place in terms of human losses, after Belarus (25.3%), which paid the heaviest blood toll, as evidenced by one of the two or three most important films in world cinema: the terrifyingly realistic and at the same time deeply philosophical film " Come and See” (Иди и смотри) by the great Soviet director Elem Klimov ...

But what about the "small" peoples and nations of the USSR which are permanently ignored by Mr. Putin, in spite of the fact that their populations were almost decimated during the war? Like, for example, the Yakuts who lost about 61% of their men who fought with the Red Army! Or the Jews of the USSR who also suffered enormous losses, the greatest of all the nations of the Soviet Union, since out of the 500,000 who fought in the ranks of the Red Army, 200,000 were killed, or 40% (!), while 2 million Jewish civilians also lost their lives. It is obviously because of this well-organized falsification of history that we persist in speaking, for example, of the "liberation of Auschwitz by Russian soldiers", when in reality "Auschwitz was liberated by the 322nd division of the Red Army's 'First Ukrainian Front'". That is, mainly by Ukrainian soldiers. And this is only one of countless examples of this kind...

So, when Putin and his Great-Russian propaganda not only ignore the sacrifices of all these peoples, nations and nationalities, but even confiscate their sacrifices and deaths by attributing them to .... "Russians", we no longer have a simple fraud, a simple lie, but something much worse, a real sacrilege! And the reason for this sacrilege is more than obvious. Having decreed that there is no Ukrainian nation (1), Putin obviously cannot admit that there were millions of Ukrainians who died fighting the Third Reich 80 years ago. And even more, it is inconceivable for him to accept that Ukrainian casualties were proportionally greater than the already appalling Russian losses. In fact, since he insists on declaring that Ukrainians are nothing but "Nazified" Russians, he ends up - quite "reasonably" in his irrationality - by russifying their World War II deaths as well.

So, we have to admit that the ghosts of the past are haunting the present as never before, when even the terrible blood toll paid by the Soviet population in its anti-fascist struggle is today the object of a well-orchestrated operation of falsification of history. Just to serve the propagandistic needs of the unscrupulous grave robber that is Mr. Putin! ....

Note

1. See our text: Putin: “Lenin is the author of today’s Ukraine” - Or how all this is the fault of... Lenin and the Bolsheviks! http://europe-solidaire.org/spip.php?article61979

The photo accompanying our text is by the important Soviet Jewish photojournalist Dmitri Baltermants and has its own tragic history. It was taken in January 1942, in Kerch, Crimea, immediately after the first Wehrmacht withdrawal and the discovery of the bodies of both Soviet partisans and 5,000 Jews massacred in a ravine by the infamous Nazi Einsatzkommando. The photograph, published in 1965 and known worldwide as "Grief", shows "men and women searching for their husbands, fathers, brothers or sons among the corpses that litter the ground". The woman wearing a white kerchief was photographed as she discovered her husband's body (neither of them was Jewish). Five months later, the Nazis returned to Kerch, and then an event occurred that strongly recalls the Ukrainian news of today: 10,000 soldiers of the Red Army and 5,000 inhabitants of the city took refuge in the "catacombs", which are nothing more than tunnels of an old limestone quarry. There they fought for six months, with less and less food, water and ammunition, and resisted the constant attacks of the enemy, to whom they inflicted enormous losses. Their resistance continued until October 1942, and was only broken when the German forces flooded the galleries, after making massive use of poison gas. Of the approximately 15,000 people who took refuge in the catacombs, only 48 survived…

Mariupol is not far from Kerch, it is just on the opposite coast of the Sea of Azov, and if all the above reminds you of something of the bloody news of this spring 2022, then you have seen right...

Bienvenue dans le Club de Mediapart

Tout·e abonné·e à Mediapart dispose d’un blog et peut exercer sa liberté d’expression dans le respect de notre charte de participation.

Les textes ne sont ni validés, ni modérés en amont de leur publication.

Voir notre charte

À la Une de Mediapart

Journal — Amérique Latine
Au Mexique, Pérou, Chili, en Argentine, Bolivie, Colombie, peut-être au Brésil... Et des défis immenses
Les forces progressistes reprennent du poil de la bête du Rio Grande jusqu’à la Terre de Feu. La Colombie est le dernier pays en date à élire un président de gauche, avant un probable retour de Lula au Brésil. Après la pandémie, les défis économiques, sociaux et environnementaux sont immenses.
par François Bougon
Journal — États-Unis
Devant la Cour suprême, le désarroi des militantes pro-avortement
Sept ans presque jour pour jour après la légalisation du mariage gay par la Cour suprême des États-Unis, celle-ci a décidé de revenir sur un autre droit : l’accès à l’avortement. Devant l’institution, à Washington, la tristesse des militants pro-IVG a côtoyé la joie des opposants.
par Alexis Buisson
Journal — Politique
Avoir un vrai scrutin proportionnel ? Il n’est jamais trop tard pour l’adopter
Malgré l’absence de majorité absolue à l’Assemblée, une réforme du mode de scrutin aux législatives serait toujours utile. Celui qui est en vigueur continue à produire des effets problématiques, tandis qu’un passage à la proportionnelle pourrait procurer des avantages supplémentaires. 
par Fabien Escalona
Journal
L’« Eurafrique » : quand le projet européen soutenait des ambitions coloniales
Les Suédois Peo Hansen et Stefan Jonsson mettent au jour l’origine coloniale de l’Union européenne, dans un essai centré sur le concept méconnu d’Eurafrique. Cette notion controversée connut une gloire éphémère jusqu’à la conclusion du traité de Rome en 1957 avant d’être effacée des mémoires.
par Ludovic Lamant

La sélection du Club

Billet de blog
L'avortement fait partie de la sexualité hétéro
Quand j'ai commencé à avoir des relations sexuelles avec mes petits copains, j'avais la trouille de tomber enceinte. Ma mère a toujours dépeint le fait d'avorter comme une épreuve terrible dont les femmes ne se remettent pas.
par Nina Innana
Billet de blog
Roe VS Wade, ou la nécessité de retirer le pouvoir à ceux qui nous haïssent
Comment un Etat de droit peut-il remettre en cause le droit des femmes à choisir pour elles-mêmes ? En revenant sur la décision Roe vs Wade, la Cour suprême des USA a rendu a nouveau tangible cette barrière posée entre les hommes et les femmes, et la haine qui la bâtit.
par Raphaëlle Rémy-Leleu
Billet de blog
Droit à l’avortement: aux États-Unis, la Cour Suprême renverse Roe v. Wade
La Cour Suprême s’engage dans la révolution conservatrice. Après la décision d'hier libéralisant le port d’armes, aujourd'hui, elle décide d'en finir avec le droit à l'avortement. Laisser la décision aux États, c’est encourager l’activisme de groupes de pression réactionnaires financés par des milliardaires évangéliques ou trumpistes. Que se passera-t-il aux élections de mi-mandat ?
par Eric Fassin
Billet de blog
Cour Suprême : femme, débrouille-toi !
Décision mal-historique de la Cour Suprême états-unienne d’abroger la loi Roe vs. Wade de 1973 qui décriminalisait l’avortement. Décision de la droite religieuse et conservatrice qui ne reconnaît plus de libre arbitre à la femme.
par esther heboyan