Francois Amblard
Physicien et biologiste, directeur de recherche CNRS detaché en Corée du Sud comme chercheur et professeur.
Abonné·e de Mediapart

2 Billets

0 Édition

Billet de blog 22 avr. 2020

Francois Amblard
Physicien et biologiste, directeur de recherche CNRS detaché en Corée du Sud comme chercheur et professeur.
Abonné·e de Mediapart

How did Korean democracy tame Covid-19?

The following is an account of a personal experience of the epidemic in South Korea. From first-hand documents and witnesses collected on site, it provides an in-depth analysis of the epidemiological, legal and medical tools implemented against Covid-19, as well as prospects for "exit". The author, François Amblard, is a French physicist and biologist who now works at a Korean public university.

Francois Amblard
Physicien et biologiste, directeur de recherche CNRS detaché en Corée du Sud comme chercheur et professeur.
Abonné·e de Mediapart

Ce blog est personnel, la rédaction n’est pas à l’origine de ses contenus.

South Korea contained Covid-19 by placing its Korean Center for Disease Control (KCDC) at the heart of the health crisis response. By law, the KCDC is mandated to manage the totality of health operations and enjoys for the purpose of its mission exceptional executive powers, with authority over the police and judiciary.

All actions against the pandemic (screening, tracing, isolation, hospitalisation, etc.), as well as all the necessary administrative and legal tools, are thus placed under a single management. This remarkable cohesion has enabled a very rapid and vigorous response.

Finally, currently under the direction of a woman, a Professor of medicine who had experience in fighting the previous epidemic, the KCDC enjoys a relatively independent authority recognized by all, as it is based on scientific knowledge, professionalism as well as transparent actions and communication. Being perceived as a politically independent body, its action has remained away from one-sided political criticism.

The rapid and massive implementation of the now well-known screening-tracking and isolation doctrine was made possible by this original legal and political context, not forgetting the mobilization of the health industry for the design of the tests in the first half of January, approved for marketing on February 4, i.e. 14 days before Covid-19 explodes in South Korea.

The tracing of persons only concerns individuals who are proven to be carriers; it is strictly retrospective and only concerns the two weeks prior to the test. Apart from the telephone health follow-up, twice a day, of any person who tests positive during two weeks of isolation, there is no procedure for tracing, neither particular nor general.

The database, hosted outside the government, is subject to a strict access control; all requests for information are recorded and will be destroyed at the end of the Covid-19 crisis. This April 15, 2020, the day of legislative elections under high health protection, no lifting of the measures in force has been announced.

The school system is completely closed, and courses are gradually being switched to online or television. No re-opening is planned, and tens of thousands of digital tablets have been given to the children of families who have no internet accesses. As long as a vaccine or therapy do not exist, the KCDC will continue its role of pilot and keep its exceptional powers.

To prepare for life during this waiting period, the Korean government is working with the companies and the education system in order to imagine more acceptable temporary and consensual modus vivendi yet refusing to compromise with the anti-Covid-19 doctrine.

The following is an account of a personal experience of the epidemic in South Korea. From first-hand documents and witnesses collected on site, it provides an in-depth analysis of the epidemiological, legal and medical tools implemented against Covid-19, as well as prospects for "exit".

The author is a French researcher who, after his work at the Institut Curie (Paris), has been pursuing his research for almost five years at a Korean public university.

Click on the link below to read the report

Report Summary:

South Korea contained Covid-19 by placing its Korean Center for Disease Control (KCDC) at the heart of the health crisis response. By law, the KCDC is mandated to manage the totality of health operations and enjoys for the purpose of its mission exceptional executive powers, with authority over the police and judiciary. All actions against the pandemic (screening, tracing, isolation, hospitalisation, etc.), as well as all the necessary administrative and legal tools, are thus placed under a single management. This remarkable cohesion has enabled a very rapid and vigorous response. Finally, currently under the direction of a woman, a Professor of medicine who had experience in fighting the previous epidemic, the KCDC enjoys a relatively independent authority recognized by all, as it is based on scientific knowledge, professionalism as well as transparent actions and communication. Being perceived as a politically independent body, its action has remained away from one-sided political criticism.


The rapid and massive implementation of the now well-known screening-tracking and isolation doctrine was made possible by this original legal and political context, not forgetting the mobilization of the health industry for the design of the tests in the first half of January, approved for marketing on February 4, i.e. 14 days before Covid-19 explodes in South Korea. The tracing of persons only concerns individuals who are proven to be carriers; it is strictly retrospective and only concerns the two weeks prior to the test. Apart from the telephone health follow-up, twice a day, of any person who tests positive during two weeks of isolation, there is no procedure for tracing, neither particular nor general. The database, hosted outside the government, is subject to a strict access control; all requests for information are recorded and will be destroyed at the end of the Covid-19 crisis. This April 15, 2020, the day of legislative elections under high health protection, no lifting of the measures in force has been announced. The school system is completely closed, and courses are gradually being switched to online or television. No re-opening is planned, and tens of thousands of digital tablets have been given to the children of families who have no internet accesses. As long as a vaccine or therapy do not exist, the KCDC will continue its role of pilot and keep its exceptional powers. To prepare for life during this waiting period, the Korean government is working with the companies and the education system in order to imagine more acceptable temporary and consensual modus vivendi yet refusing to compromise with the anti-Covid-19 doctrine.
The following is an account of a personal experience of the epidemic in South Korea. From first-hand documents and witnesses collected on site, it provides an in-depth analysis of the epidemiological, legal and medical tools implemented against Covid-19, as well as prospects for "exit".
The author is a French researcher who, after his work at the Institut Curie (Paris), has been pursuing his research for almost five years at a Korean public university.
Contents
Introduction
1. Retrospective tracing and isolation of virus carriers
1.1 Individual contamination investigation procedures
1.2 Data storage and legal safeguards
1.3 Actions arising from tracing
1.4 Dissemination of data: challenge and buy-in
1.5 Resistance and adhesion
2. Medical response: isolate and treat
2.1 Clinical stages: definition and initial orientation
2.2 Therapeutic recommendations, hydroxychloroquine, informal trials
2.3 Isolation facilities to contain Covid-19
2.4 Management and obligations of Covid+ patient contacts
2.5 Systematic isolation of all travellers entering the territory
2.6 Criteria for release from isolation and subsequent rules
2.7 Protection of the elderly
2.8 Have there been hospital overcrowded, lack of tests or masks?
3. Ongoing therapeutic trials
3.1 Hydroxychloroquine formal test
3.2 Institut Pasteur in Seoul: drug repositioning with ciclesonide (Alvesco)
3.3 Other clinical trials
4. What to do once the curve is inflected?
4.1 Covid-19's track record in South Korea
4.2 Daily life today, freedom and surveillance
4.3 Consensual development of a sustainable modus vivendi
Conclusion

Ce blog est personnel, la rédaction n’est pas à l’origine de ses contenus.

Bienvenue dans le Club de Mediapart

Tout·e abonné·e à Mediapart dispose d’un blog et peut exercer sa liberté d’expression dans le respect de notre charte de participation.

Les textes ne sont ni validés, ni modérés en amont de leur publication.

Voir notre charte

À la Une de Mediapart

Journal — Médias
Faux scoop du « Point » sur Garrido-Corbière : un « accident industriel » écrit d’avance
Alors que l’hebdo avait promis de faire son autocritique en publiant une enquête pour revenir sur ses fausses accusations visant le couple LFI, la direction l’a finalement enterrée. Sur la base de documents internes, Mediapart retrace les coulisses de ce fiasco, prédit deux mois avant par des salariés.
par David Perrotin et Antton Rouget
Journal
Lutte contre l’antisémitisme : angle mort de la gauche ?
Les militants de la gauche antiraciste ont-ils oublié l’antisémitisme ? Un essai questionne le rôle des gauches dans la lutte contre l’antisémitisme et plaide pour la convergence des combats. Débat dans « À l’air libre » entre son autrice, Illana Weizman, un militant antiraciste, Jonas Pardo, et le député insoumis Alexis Corbière.
par À l’air libre
Journal — Parlement
La loi sur les énergies renouvelables est-elle vertueuse ?
Alors que le projet de loi sur le développement de l’éolien et du solaire est en cours d’examen à l’Assemblée nationale, les macronistes savent qu’ils ont besoin de la gauche pour le faire adopter. Mediapart a réuni la députée insoumise Clémence Guetté et le député Renaissance Jean-Marc Zulesi pour éclaircir les points de blocage et les possibilités d’évolution.
par Pauline Graulle et Amélie Poinssot
Journal
Face au mur social, Macron choisit de foncer
Dans un contexte d’inflation record, de conflits sociaux dans les entreprises et d’état alarmant des services publics, le président de la République souhaite réformer les retraites dès le début de l’année 2023. Le climat social gronde mais l’exécutif mise sur une « résignation » de la rue.
par Ilyes Ramdani

La sélection du Club

Billet de blog
Une famille intégrée ou comment s'en débarrasser - Appel OQTF
6 décembre : appel de la décision de l'obligation de quitter le territoire devant le tribunal administratif de Clermont-Ferrand, décision que nous avons déjà chroniquée. Cette famille particulièrement intégrée doit rester ici. Voici quelques vérités fortes apportées par son avocate et un des responsable de RESF63, le jour même d'un « débat » sur la loi immigration à l'Assemblée Nationale !
par Georges-André
Billet de blog
Loi Darmanin contre les étranger·e·s : danger pour tou·te·s !
Ce mardi 6 décembre a lieu à 17H00 un premier « débat » sur l'immigration à l'Assemblée nationale initié par Gérald Darmanin préparant une loi pour le 1er trimestre 2023. Avec la Marche des Solidarités et les Collectifs de Sans-Papiers, nous serons devant l'Assemblée à partir de 16H00 pour lancer la mobilisation contre ce projet. Argumentaire.
par Marche des Solidarités
Billet de blog
Morts en Méditerrannée : plainte devant la CPI contre la violence institutionnelle
La plainte va soulever la question de la responsabilité de l'Italie, Malte, la commission européenne et l'agence Frontex dans le bilan catastrophique de plusieurs dizaines de milliers de noyés en Méditarrannée depuis 2014, au mépris du droit international et des droits humains. Questions sur la violence institutionnelle à rapprocher du projet de loi contre les migrants que dépose l'exécutif.
par Patrick Cahez
Billet de blog
La liberté d’aller et venir entravée pour les habitant⋅es de Mayotte
Le Conseil constitutionnel a jugé conforme à la Constitution les contrôles d’identité systématiques sur l’ensemble du territoire de Mayotte sans limite dans le temps. Il assortit sa décision d’une réserve qui apparait vide de sens : ces contrôles ne peuvent s’effectuer « qu’en se fondant sur des critères excluant […] toute discrimination », alors qu’ils apparaissent par essence discriminatoires.
par association GISTI