Let’s use some low level concepts of anthropology, some pop culture references, the Hebrew Bible, and some basic principles of British law to describe the timeless phenomenon we are encountering today in America.
Let’s start with the term “nomad” which encompasses three general types: nomadic hunters and gatherers, pastoral nomads, and tinker or trader nomads.
If we define a nomad as a member of a people or tribe that has no permanent abode but moves about from place to place, I myself could certainly be called on. In fact, my family, in general, dating back centuries.
In 2020, there ought not to be a stigma attached to nomadism, but there certainly is. If you live in France, Poland, Hungary, Ukraine and America, you will probably say that, yes, globalism does deserve the red letters ascribed to it. And if you are familiar with the Fyre Festival you have a contemporary cultural reference.
The Fyre Festival is the age old story of how colonizers come in, promise shit, and leave people completely screwed over. It is what we call “globalism” today. Globalists sold people a lie they refused to let go of even when it was crystal clear that everybody knew it was a lie.
Don’t Blame The Jews
The Hebrews were originally nomads. The “Jewish Bible” changed history by literally creating history. The Jewish Bible gave the world the idea of the freedom to move —nomadism. The Jewish Bible gave the world the notions of law and of modern science and the pursuit of education to ultimately influence —civil service.
The Torah, the Jewish Bible, created the blueprint for the service nomad, the road warrior. In olden times they were called tinkers and traders.
The most important aspect of the service nomad adaptation is their nearly total dependence of the sedentary people amongst whom they move. Previously, the entire income of the nomad was coming from the sedentary people they served. Today, they are being subsidized by a foreign entity, which is the model of globalism.
Blame British Law
Most thought on intellectual property and its legal aspects draws from Western ideas, especially British, American, and former British colonies, quite frankly, in the concerted practice of imperialism and colonialism, namely, neo-colonialism. The laws of the British Crown.
As the Empires of the late 19th century and early 20th century, especially the British Empire, extended their global reach, they applied their own intellectual property rights laws in the new territories they controlled. They did so first and foremost for their own benefit.
The imposition of a foreign, external law onto a local population should have resulted in tremendous conflict. However, the entire racket was sold from and has been told from the colonizers’ perspective. Of course, we’re taking the law here, so the consequences were dire.
Thus, the deceitful social construction of the laws, and the powers at stake says everything about the “official history,” which was typically told or mediated by the colonizers. The Fyre Festival of intellectual property without the hot chicks in bikinis.
Nations worldwide have experienced difficulties reconciling local laws and local culture with a predominantly Western legal system, in many cases leaving their citizens’ individual rights largely unprotected.
This would be a good time to remind you that George Soros spends billions on corrupting legislation and tampering with the courts and justice system in America. The same kind of degrading jurisprudence that was used to install slavery, segregation, incarceration and institutionalized racism —settler colonialism.
Ignore the QAnon language that has littered the media. We are encountering a timeless phenomenon.