Le blog de Marianne France

Aucune mise en examen après la plainte de la troisième plaignante, la correspondance entre le professeur et la femme quadragénaire, remise par l’intellectuel, ainsi que de nombreux mensonges et contradictions, avaient permis de déterminer qu’il n’y avait jamais eu viol. Un an et demi plus tard, où en sommes-nous ? Bilan.

"Brigitte", "Maïmouna", "Régine" (according to the many names that appeared in the press or on social media networks), the Swiss plaintiff, will have to confront her own contradictory statements before the Swiss court. In fact, it [the court] will have to investigate a file which, as of now, is dogged by inconsistencies (which the witnesses said were countless) and suspicion of collusion.

At the heart of the Tariq Ramadan case, a multitude of notorious intellectual opponents are suspected of collusion. While the investigating judges have never responded to the requests submitted by Ramadan’s lawyer, Emmanuel Marsigny, to interrogate the individuals most often cited in the case, many questions remain unanswered regarding their involvement

« Brigitte », « Maïmouna », « Régine » (selon les différents prénoms qui sont apparus dans la presse ou sur les réseaux sociaux), la plaignante suisse, va devoir faire face à ses propres déclarations et à ses contradictions devant la justice helvétique.

On October 19, 2017, Henda Ayari filed a complaint against Tariq Ramadan accusing him of rape in the wake of the #MeToo and#BalanceTonPorc movement. A year and a half later, the investigation’s outcome shows that the forty-year-old woman has lied many times

Le 19 Octobre 2017, Henda Ayari portait plainte contre Tariq Ramadan pour viol dans le sillage du mouvement #BalanceTonPorc. Un an et demi plus tard, le bilan de l’enquête prouve que la quadragénaire a menti à de multiples reprises.

The investigation conducted by the Criminal Brigade during these last months is very clear: the two plaintiffs’ testimonies, Henda Ayari and Paule-Emma Aline, are not reliable. Nevertheless, the judges insist on building a case against Tariq Ramadan and do not take into consideration the Criminal Brigade investigations’ conclusions although the investigation was commissioned by them!

The Geneva report, commissioned by the Geneva Republic’s State Council, concluded that there was no objective reason to believe that the anonymous accusations made against Tariq Ramadan, are true. As has always been the case, some media outlets voluntarily choose to hide the facts and instead relay false information.

Le rapport genevois diligenté par le conseil d’Etat de la République et du canton de Genève conclut qu’aucun élément objectif ne permet de soupçonner Tariq Ramadan des accusations anonymes proférées à son encontre. Comme à leur habitude dans cette affaire, certains médias travestissent volontairement les faits et relayent de fausses informations.